Thursday, November 11, 2021

Dolor en el exilio cubano: se fue un luchador por la libertad

Por Macky Arenas

Reinol González, el legendario el Secretario General de la JOC (Juventud Obrera Católica de Cuba), cuya alucinante historia merece ser contada


Una ola de pesar, tan densa que se puede cortar con un cuchillo, recorre el exilio cubano. Hace horas falleció en Miami un líder histórico en el combate por la libertad de su patria, Cuba. Fue un demócrata cabal pues no sólo se enfrentó a la dictadura militar de Fulgencio Batista, sino posteriormente, a la férrea y atea que impuso Fidel Castro,irónicamente, egresado de las aulas jesuitas en La Habana.

Reinol militaba en el sindicalismo cristiano. Su compromiso con su fe era fuerte y llegó a liderar la poderosa JOC, Juventud Obrera Católica. Los aparatos represivos de ambas dictaduras lo persiguieron.

Siendo uno de los principales dirigentes de la resistencia clandestina en la lucha contra el régimen totalitario establecido por Fidel Castro en Cuba, cayó preso el 12 de octubre de 1961. Condenado a 30 años de cárcel, permaneció encarcelado por dieciséis y dos meses. 

Vivió en el aterrador centro de reclusión conocido como «Punto X» centro principal de torturas del régimen. Una vez fuera, Reinol escribiría un libro que tituló Y Fidel creó el Punto X donde describió sus vivencias en ese lugar.

Mi testimonio personal

Comparto profundamente el dolor de tantos cubanos por la muerte de Reinol. Puedo y quiero ofrecer un testimonio personal de la significación de su vida y la de su esposa, como testimonio de amor, de entrega, de consecuencia entre ambos y de ambos para con la lucha que los había unido y también separado.

Él y su esposa fueron muy amigos de mis padres y tíos. Siempre escuché hablar en mi casa, desde que tuve uso de razón, de Reinol González, de su valor, de sus principios imbatibles, de su presidio, de su entereza aún en los peores momentos y de los esfuerzos que todo el que podía hacía para verlo libre. 

Era como la causa de todo el mundo. Uno de esos presos que el castrismo no soltaba. Una joya de la corona del despotismo caribeño. Cuando era una niña, lo imaginaba como una especie de coloso, de Hércules de la libertad.

Personalmente, tuve muy cercano trato con él. No sólo porque venía con frecuencia a Venezuela – donde estuvo exiliado en tiempos de Batista – sino porque, visitando nosotros Miami, era un compromiso fijo de papá ver a Reinol y conversar con él. Yo asistía fascinada, escuchando sus conversaciones, análisis y relatos de la epopeya que, cada quien a su manera, todos vivieron en lo que coinciden en llamar «la tragedia de Cuba».

En la familia, admiramos sinceramente a ese matrimonio y seguíamos a la incansable Teresita – fallecida años antes – en sus recorridos a lo largo y ancho del planeta, pidiendo a presidentes, reyes y primeros ministros gestiones por la libertad de su esposo y padre de sus hijos. Nunca perdió la esperanza y tampoco la fe. Finalmente, fue liberado el 11 de diciembre de 1977.

«Nos reencontramos viejos pero el amor seguía joven»

Cuando a Reinol lo hacen preso, eran una pareja muy joven, podía decirse que recién casados. Teresita estaba embarazada de gemelos. Llevaba cinco meses de gestación. Tuvo que salir de la isla y, con gran esfuerzo y dedicación, sacar adelante a sus hijos. 

Trabajaba como una hormiguita. Era vivaz y enérgica. Recuerdo bien a mamá, cada vez que íbamos a Miami, advirtiendo: «Aquí nadie compra en otro lado que no sea la tienda de Teresita». 

La tienda era un salón de su casa donde exponía toda la ropa que había quedado en los grandes almacenes, al pasar las temporadas, que ella compraba a bajo precio y revendía. Así pagó los estudios de sus hijos. Así compró un auto y su propia casa. Comprar lo que ella vendía era la manera como muchos cubanos podían ayudarla en sus finanzas.

Hablar de Reinol sin hablar de Teresita es imposible. Cuándo él llegó a Miami, una vez liberado, encontró a sus hijos perfectamente educados, la casa que Teresita había comprado, un auto en la puerta y, lo más increíble: una biblioteca donde ella iba coleccionando todos los libros que pensaba él querría leer, para ponerse al día, al salir de un encierro donde el duro aislamiento no les permitía mantenerse al tanto de las publicaciones ni de lo que acontece en el mundo.

Conocieron a su padre después de 17 años

Cuando cierta flexibilización llegó para las comunicaciones telefónicas de los presos políticos con sus familiares, Reinol podía conversar con sus hijos y seguir de lejos sus progresos, conocer sus inquietudes y compartir sus anhelos. 

Conocieron a su padre después de 17 años y Teresita se encontró con un hombre físicamente distinto al que dejó. Recuerdo que Reinol, bromista como todo cubano, me decía riendo: «Imagínate, nos separaron jóvenes, buenmozos…y ahora nos reencontramos arrugados, yo con un problema de visión, gordo y feo!». 

Pero siempre agregaba: «Eso sí, el amor está intacto. Teresita tiene un mérito descomunal. Lo que hizo por nuestros hijos, por mi libertad y por mantener vivo mi recuerdo no se ve todos los días. Es impagable».

En honor a la verdad, ¡cuántos casos de matrimonios rotos y de amores extinguidos por no soportar tanta adversidad, naufragados en el mar del olvido y el hastío! Pero eso no era con Teresita. Esperó a Reinol, con la misma ilusión, siempre, y lo acompañó hasta que ella partió, la primera.

Ayer, fiesta de San Judas Tadeo, perdimos a Reinol. El patrono de los casos imposibles debe haberlo recibido en el Cielo. Porque allá y a ningún otro lado fue Reinol. Sin la menor duda. No puedo afirmar que Teresita se encomendara a este santo pero lo cierto es que logró lo imposible: ver a su esposo retornar al hogar, del cual jamás han debido separarlo. Pero hay una increíble historia detrás.

Un relato de Cien años de Soledad

Después de mucho recorrer y sin la menor intención de bajar la guardia, Teresita se fue a Colombia. Pidió hablar con el Presidente – entonces López Michelsen – y la audiencia le fue concedida. Expuso lo de siempre, su petición de ayuda, de interceder ante el régimen de Castro por la libertad de su esposo. Al ver el tesón y la firmeza de ella, el mandatario prometió ayudar, sin saber muy bien de qué manera.

Aquí comienza lo que Teresita me contó en casa de una de mis tías en Miami. “Al terminar la audiencia, me dijo: «Señora, ya que está aquí, me gustaría invitarla a una cena en palacio esta noche. Quisiera tener con usted esa atención». Confesó que fue sin ganas y cansada por el viaje. 

«Llegué y me sientan al lado de un señor que dijo llamarse Gabriel García Márquez. Amablemente se presentó, me buscó conversación y me pidió que le contara por qué estaba yo en Bogotá. Nada, chica, trataba de entablar un diálogo con alguien que no conocía pero que le había tocado al lado», me refirió jocosa.

Ella comenzó a relatarle su historia, cómo pasó todo, cómo sus hijos hablaban de tanto en tanto con su padre por teléfono, la hija le tocaba el piano y el varón discutía con él sobre ajedrez. Cómo ella había luchado por criarlos sola. También le refirió sus viajes por el mundo rogando por su esposo. 

«Él me escuchó atentamente y se mostraba cada vez más conmovido. Me dijo: señora, su historia podría estar en uno de mis libros. Parece un relato de Cien años de Soledad! Yo voy a ayudarla, haré que su esposo regrese con su familia».

Ella quedó con la misma sensación después de cada cita en cada país, con la misma impresión de que todo eran buenas intenciones pero… y se decía: «Si no han podido reyes y gobernantes, ¿cómo va a poder este señor?» Y olvidó el episodio. 

Obviamente, ella no tenía mucha idea de quién se trataba. Era, nada más y nada menos, que el posterior premio Nobel de Literatura en 1982 y principal exponente del Realismo Mágico en Latinoamérica. A fin de cuentas, pensaría ella, ¡el intelectual era Reinol!

Dios los sentó

Más de un favor le debería Castro a García Márquez, pero fue Dios quien se lo sentó al lado en el Palacio de Nariño.

Dos o tres meses después, él la llama por teléfono a su casa de Miami: «Señora, soy García Máquez. ¿Su esposo está con usted?». Ella le pregunta: «¿Quién dice usted que es?» Él le recuerda: «El señor que estaba a su lado en la cena en Colombia». «Ah – responde ella – si, ya lo recuerdo. No, señor, mi esposo no está aquí».

Teresita pensó – ella era también muy divertida – que el tipo de la mesa le había resultado más loco de lo que pensaba. «Figúrate tú, qué más puedo pensar de uno que me llama a preguntar si Reinol está conmigo…¡por supuesto que no está! ¡Esta preso en Cuba!». Él agregó: «Sabrá de mí en breve». Hasta ahí el asunto, por el momento. Ella volvió a olvidar el asunto, pensando que, en serio, al personaje le faltaba un tornillo.

El corre-corre

Un par de meses después, vuelve el teléfono a sonar. Ella cuenta que estaba preparando una cazuela de pollo y a duras penas pudo tomar el auricular. De nuevo, era el tal García Márquez. «Señor, mi esposo no está aquí, ya se lo he dicho…» 

Él se limitó a anunciar: «Espere, que se lo voy a pasar». Y en el teléfono… ¡la voz de Reinol! Le dijo que ese señor lo acababa de sacar de la prisión y de Cuba, que estaba en el aeropuerto de Barajas en Madrid y que la primera llamada había sido para ella. Que se fuera en el primer avión.

Mi tía relata: «Me llamó, con gran excitación me puso en cuenta y me dijo: te dejo la llave de mi casa bajo la alfombra de la entrada. ¡Salgo con lo que tengo puesto al aeropuerto!». Era el fin de una larga separación y el comienzo, por fin, de una vida juntos.

«Vengo a llevármelo»

Llegando a Madrid le contaron la historia. Reinol me relató lo siguiente: García Márquez le había dicho a Fidel: «Jamás te he pedido un favor. Ahora te pido que liberes a Reinol González. Es un compromiso que tengo». 

Le dijo que sí, pero no lo hizo. Reinol seguía preso. Así que tomó un avión y se presentó en La Habana. Le dijo a Castro: «Vengo a llevármelo». «Si, chico, llévatelo».

Reinol cuenta que fueron a su celda a tomarle medidas y pensó «bueno, me van a fusilar y me toman medidas para la caja»; pero no, le hicieron un traje a la carrera y lo llevaron a la presencia del fulano García Márquez, que lo esperaba con un avión encendido en pista. 

Me dijo: «Volamos a Madrid. Lo voy a llevar con su familia, como le prometí a su esposa».

Reinol, que no entendía nada, escuchó el relato y se puso al día en muchas cosas con García Márquez. Se hicieron íntimos amigos, tanto, que Reinol terminó siendo su editor. 

Viajaba mucho a México por ese motivo y cuando García Márquez llegaba a Miami se hospedaba en la casa de Reinol y Teresita. De esa amistad hay profusión de testimonios escritos y gráficos.

Hay muchas personas que tienen mejores versiones que la mía, pero ofrezco las que escuché de primera mano. Y hay mucho más que contar pero esto no tendría fin. Reinol vino un día a Caracas, fuimos a cenar y hablamos de lo divino y de lo humano. También fui su amiga y agradezco a Dios por eso.

«Ecumenismo intelectual»

Un día, él escribió: «Con Gabo he tenido el placer de coincidir muchas veces y de discrepar otras tantas y seguir siendo amigos. Esa es la esencia misma de la libertad: poder exponer el propio criterio y punto de vista, sea el que sea, sin que suceda nada».

Y precisa la razón por la cual lo reveló: «Porque de vez en cuando se leen o se escuchan, en algunos medios, críticas intolerantes para descalificar a ese gran escritor y sin conceder el más mínimo reconocimiento a las intervenciones que ha hecho prestando ayuda a cubanos en apuros, no sólo a intelectuales sino a personas de todo tipo. Y es cierto que Gabo ha tenido amistad con Castro; sin embargo, no sólo no podemos ignorar las infinitas muestras de admiración y respeto que ha dedicado al pueblo de Cuba, al que está dentro, en suelo patrio, pero también al que está fuera, disperso por el resto del mundo».

Ambos dejan el valioso legado de una especie de «ecumenismo intelectual» que prueba que los seres humanos pueden ser distintos y compasivos en esencia, que puede estar uno en la acera del frente de otro y entenderse como seres humanos en el intercambio respetuoso, y también que no hay barreras para el cariño y la camaradería siempre que el alma sea noble.

Hoy, si bien lamentamos su partida, celebramos su llegada a la Casa del Padre. Ya está con Teresita. Nos queda su cercanía, su gratísimo recuerdo y su ejemplo de gran patriota y un ser humano que se pierde de vista.


Saturday, November 6, 2021

The Butcher*


How a drifter from Milwaukee became the chief executioner of the Cuban Revolution—and a test case for U.S. civil rights.

By Tony Perrottet

Part One

On the balmy night of April 9, 1959, a little over three months after Fidel Castro and Che Guevara seized power in Cuba, a group of famous international writers gathered in El Floridita, a popular restaurant in Old Havana. They were an urbane set—Tennessee Williams, George Plimpton, Elaine Dundy, and her husband, Kenneth Tynan—and they were expecting to carouse with Cuba’s most beloved yanqui, Ernest Hemingway. Instead, they encountered another Midwestern expatriate, wearing a wide military belt and a hulking .45 service revolver.

Burly and tattooed, the man had rough-hewn good looks. He was in his late thirties—more than two decades younger than Hemingway—and stood five-foot-ten, with thick brown hair and, in the words of his draft card, a “ruddy” complexion. An English journalist later described him as “tall, straight and meanly friendly,” with striking blue eyes that, “yellowing after only a few beers, suggested company dangerous to keep when drunk.” The American’s words tumbled out in the distinctively nasal accent of someone from blue-collar Milwaukee. He pronounced “that” as “dat” and dropped his g’s. He was the uneducated son of Polish immigrants, the type of man one of Williams’s own fictional snobs might have called a redneck.

But if his origins were humble, at El Floridita the man needed no introduction. His image had appeared on the front pages of newspapers across the United States. In fact, after Hemingway, he was probably the most notorious American in the Caribbean. His name was Herman Marks, and he had risen through the ranks of Castro’s rebel army to command the revolution’s firing squads. Around Havana, there were rumors that he had a sadistic streak; his version of a coup de grâce, it was said, was to empty his pistol into a condemned man’s face, so relatives could not recognize the corpse. Marks’s brutal work had earned him a nickname: He was El Carnicero—the Butcher.

The literati peppered him with questions, and Marks responded with pride. He boasted of being second-in-command to Che himself at La Cabaña prison, and declared that he was so busy, he conducted nightly executions until 2 a.m., and sometimes until dawn. He called the proceedings “festivities” and showed off his cuff links made from spent bullet shells.

Marks knew what the gathered writers were really after. It was an open secret in Havana that he invited select visitors to the executions, which were conducted in the empty stone moat around La Cabaña, beneath a giant floodlit statue of Christ with outstretched arms. American politicians, journalists, starlets, and socialites had all made discreet inquiries about watching a firing squad do its work. Williams, whose grandfather had been a minister, forlornly felt that he might comfort a condemned man by offering “a small encouraging smile” before he was shot.

On this particular night, Marks told the group at El Floridita, he had a busy schedule. The prisoners awaiting execution included a German mercenary. “He made the invitation as easily as he might have offered a round of cocktails at his home,” Plimpton later recalled. Marks counted the visitors out: “Let’s see… five of you… quite easy… we’ll drive over by car… tight squeeze…”

Unnoticed by the others, Tynan had been listening to Marks with growing horror, and now the Englishman leapt to his feet and began shouting. According to Plimpton, the red-faced theater critic squinted his eyes and flapped his arms like an enormous bird while denouncing Marks. He didn’t want to be in the same room as an executioner, Tynan gasped, let alone witness his handiwork. He would attend the execution only to run in front of the firing squad to protect the condemned. Tynan then stormed out of the bar, followed by Dundy.
Almost nothing about Herman Marks’s early life suggested that he would someday play a pivotal role in a Latin American revolution. He was born in Milwaukee in 1921, and raised in a neighborhood of shoddy brick houses and bare streets. His father, Frederick, was an unemployed alcoholic who beat him; his mother, Martha Yelich, barely kept the family afloat by working as a short-order cook in a diner. He does not appear to have been close with his elder sister, Elsie, or his younger one, Dorothy; but he remained devoted to his mother throughout his life, in his own eccentric fashion.

The Markses’ volatile marriage crumbled during the Great Depression, when Herman was 12. After his mother remarried, Herman began getting into trouble. He skipped classes and was expelled from every school he attended; at 14, he was sent to a reformatory, where he ran away on three occasions and was once caught stealing a car. Over the next two decades, he was arrested 32 times in ten states, from Hawaii to Maine, mostly for drunkenness, petty theft, and disorderly conduct.

He never stayed more than three months in any one place, working odd jobs in factories, on docks, and at horse ranches. In April 1939, he joined the merchant marine, and he served in the Pacific during World War II. (He later claimed in court that he “had been in jails all over” the region, including while on shore leave in Australia.) After the war, Marks floated aimlessly around the United States, Mexico, and Canada, adding to his rap sheet: vagrancy in Texas, public drunkenness in Ohio and North Dakota, attempted grand larceny in New York City, and “prowling” in Las Vegas, a crime for which he was given 30 days in jail and then told to leave town. In Los Angeles in 1949, he robbed an elderly woman, drunkenly grabbing her by the throat. According to the police report, he only made away with naphthalene mothballs “to the value of 29 cents.” He got six months for assault but escaped from jail with two friends. While fleeing, all three seriously hurt their ankles after jumping from a dangerous height; Marks and one of the other men limped on for weeks, until they were caught in Galveston, Texas, and sent back to California to finish their sentences.

Back home in Milwaukee, at age 27, Marks brawled with his mother’s third husband and physically threw him out of the house. (Yelich took her son’s side; he was fined five dollars by local authorities for his actions.) Later that same year, he was arrested and convicted of carnal knowledge with a 16-year-old girl. According to the police report, Marks was working as a stable hand and met the girl at a bar, where, the police conceded, she had shown the bartender a birth certificate that said she was an adult. The pair then attended a riotous celebration in a barn where, an investigator noted, “drinking and sex parties went on almost nightly.” Marks was sentenced to three and a half years in prison.

His niece, Penlo Hobbs, remembered her relatives being frightened of Uncle Herman well before he entered the state penitentiary in Waupun. “He was the bogeyman,” she said. “We weren’t allowed to have anything to do with him.” Even Marks’s mother had reservations about her son. “I don’t know what happened to him,” she once told the Milwaukee Sentinel. “Whatever he did was not my fault. I sent him to parochial school and raised him good.”

She said Marks was generous when he wasn’t broke, lavishing her with bouquets of flowers, but mainly he spent his money on girls and booze. And he had an explosive temper. “He was always drinking and fighting,” his mother said. “As soon as somebody said anything wrong, he was up and mad.” Marks’s erratic personality was symbolized by his tattoos. His left arm bore a double heart inscribed with the words “Love, Nellie.” (There is no record of who Nellie was.) On his right arm was a skull pierced with a dagger, alongside the military motto “Death Before Dishonor.”

His mother took Marks in after he was released from Waupun penitentiary in 1955. A few months later he left home again. “He kissed me one day and said he was going,” his mother recalled. Somebody took a photo of him looking bronzed and fit, which Yelich carried in her purse until the day she died. “I don’t think he knew where he was going,” she said. “He was looking for something.”

He found it on a shrimp boat in Florida. While hauling nets in late 1957, he ran into some men he knew from his days in the merchant marine. They were from Cuba, an island Marks had visited several times in the service, and once as a tourist. It was now embroiled in a civil war between leftist revolutionary guerrillas, led by a young lawyer named Fidel Castro, and the military dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista. That Christmas, Marks learned that one of his Cuban friends had been murdered in Havana by military police; they purportedly broke into the man’s house one night and shot him dead at his kitchen table. Soon after hearing the news, Marks went to an army surplus store in Key West and bought olive drab fatigues and paratrooper boots. With a Colt .45 revolver, $400 in cash, and “about ten words in Spanish,” as he later put it, Marks took a boat to Cuba. His plan was as audacious as it was simple: He would join the revolution.

Havana was under military curfew, with Batista’s menacing, blue-uniformed intelligence officers patrolling the streets. Loitering in the city’s bars, Marks failed to find any agents of M-26-7, Castro’s underground 26th of July Movement, named for the date of the group’s first armed uprising. So Marks took a bus east to the sleepy town of Manzanillo, in the tropical foothills of the Sierra Maestra, where he met two young Cubans also hoping to join the guerrillas. The trio hiked for three nights before reaching a jungle outpost of some 40 rebels under the command of Captain Paco Cabrera. An English-speaking officer interrogated Marks. Like many of the roughly two dozen yanquis who ultimately joined Cuba’s rebellion, Marks rewrote his personal history. According to one guerrilla, he claimed that he was a Korean War veteran; to others, he explained that his facility with weapons was born of a childhood enthusiasm for guns. He was accepted into the group with a meal of beef and celebratory rum.

Marks’s profile among the guerrillas rose when he saw three teenagers fumbling with a U.S. Army .30-caliber machine gun and stepped in to show them how to disassemble and clean it. By the time he was finished, a crowd had gathered around him, with men holding up rusted and broken weapons, wordlessly appealing for help. He was soon tasked with fixing the array of firearms used by rebel forces, everything from sport rifles to shotguns to carbines dating back to Cuba’s colonial days.

Marks was assigned to the unit led by Che Guevara, which suffered the highest casualties in the rebel army—one of its cohorts was dubbed the suicide squad. Marks quickly rose through the ranks to become a captain. In the spring of 1958, Che transferred him to Minas del Frío, a rebel stronghold, where Marks helped establish a military school and train recruits to repel the impending Operation Finish Fidel, a mass invasion of the Sierra Maestra by Batista’s army, which outnumbered the guerrillas 100 to 1. By May, Marks was on the front lines of combat. In one skirmish, he broke three teeth on a rock when he tripped leading a charge; in another, he led a group of 18 rebels who disabled a 250-man convoy in an ambush.

By August, Batista’s generals had to admit that they could not dislodge the guerrillas, and the army withdrew from the Sierra Maestra. The following month, Marks volunteered to join Che on a harrowing 350-mile mission across the mosquito-filled swamps of the eastern lowlands. The rebels hoped to establish a new base in the Escambray Mountains of central Cuba and use it to seize enough ground to effectively cut the island in half. In a biography of Castro, journalist Tad Szulc observed that the expedition, where the men would abandon the known terrain of the Sierra to trudge across exposed, unknown, and hostile territory, “must have seemed like a demented plan.” Che warned volunteers that conditions would be miserable, food short, and casualties likely close to 50 percent. Marks signed up anyway.

Although most of the mission’s men survived the trek, it was universally agreed to be the most grueling campaign of the entire war. Che’s column walked mostly at night to avoid army patrols and strafing airplanes. They forded rivers naked and once traversed a shallow lagoon filled with razor-sharp plants. They suffered from dire hunger and endured hurricane-fueled rain. “I’ve been through enough mud and water to last me the rest of my life,” Che wrote to Castro. “Hunger, thirst, weariness, the feeling of impotence against the enemy forces that were increasingly closing in on us, and above all, the terrible foot disease that the peasants called mazamorra—which turned each step our soldiers took into an intolerable torment—had made us an army of shadows.”

During a skirmish, Marks was wounded in the knee and ankle. Infection set in. “Pus and blood was continuously running, and I couldn’t get a shoe on my foot,” he later said. He had trudged with Che for over a month to get to the Escambray Mountains, but the possibility of fatal gangrene now threatened. Che decided to get the yanqui to safety. In early November, supporters of M-26-7 smuggled Marks from a farm into the city of Santa Clara, where he was dispatched by plane to Key West for medical care.

Although he had gone to great lengths to make sure Marks did not succumb to his injury, privately Che was not unhappy to see him go, writing in his war journal that the American “fundamentally … didn’t fit into the troop.” One of Che’s close aides, Enrique Acevedo, told biographer Jon Lee Anderson that Marks was “brave and crazy in combat, tyrannical and arbitrary in the peace of camp.” According to Acevedo, the American’s ruthless nature had disturbed the Cuban recruits—particularly his readiness to volunteer for execution duty, which he did with “an enthusiasm that was unseemly.”

The Cubans’ reaction to Marks echoed that of a reform-school psychiatrist who’d encountered him when he was 16. The psychiatrist reported that Marks was oddly detached—“a very stolid emotionless person when not excited” who “shows almost a lack of adequate feeling in respect to situations he finds himself in.” Later, when Marks was in Waupun prison, the facility’s psychiatrist found that he was “amoral rather than immoral,” and was “narcissistic in his makeup.”

These assessments would resonate throughout Marks’s peculiar career in Cuba.

Part Two

On New Year’s Day in 1959, Marks was resting in his hospital bed in Key West, listening to the radio, when a news update came over the airwaves: Batista had escaped from Havana in the hours before dawn that day, abandoning his country. In that moment, Castro’s rebel army had been handed effective control of Cuba. Days later, Marks hobbled to the docks and took the first ferry to Havana, which was still operating daily. He wanted to savor the victory, rejoin his compañeros, and, not incidentally, claim his promised share of property following the revolution’s land reform, which had always been at the top of Castro’s agenda.

Marks arrived in Havana on January 3 to find the city in a tense state of limbo, awaiting Castro’s arrival in a triumphant procession from the east. When news of Batista’s flight had filtered out on New Year’s Day, jubilant Habaneros sacked several casinos and smashed parking meters with baseball bats; Marks walked from the dock to the presidential palace along empty streets strewn with debris and shattered slot machines. Most of the city was under lockdown, with gun-toting cadres loyal to the M-26-7 maintaining a fragile order. Batista’s disgraced police and rank-and-file soldiers were all lying low; Boy Scouts had taken over as traffic cops, directing the few cars still on the roads.

At the presidential palace, armed student activists told Marks that his old comandante, Che, and an advance guard of 200 rebels had taken over La Cabaña. The golden-hued Spanish fortress was built in the age of conquistadors to guard galleons filled with Aztec and Incan gold from pirates; under Batista it had been a military base and a prison. It housed some 3,000 troops, but the demoralized officers had surrendered to the rebels without firing a shot. Marks made his way there to report for duty.

He spent his first night in Che’s billet, carousing, and after breakfast the next morning, Che took him to the quartermaster to find fatigues and a beret. Whatever concerns Che had had about the American during the rebels’ trek eastward the previous year weren’t enough to dissuade him from appointing Marks head of security at La Cabaña.

On January 8, Havana’s silence broke when Castro arrived, riding atop a tank and surrounded by guerrillas. He proceeded along the Malecón waterfront, thronged by adoring crowds. Eventually, Castro took the penthouse apartment atop the Havana Hilton as his temporary office, while guerrillas slept on the floor of the hotel foyer. For weeks the streets of Havana were filled with music and dancing to celebrate the demise of the ancien régime. Guerillas were offered free bus rides, meals, and alcohol wherever they went.

At La Cabaña, to focus his officers’ restless energies, Che offered literacy classes and crash courses on international politics, explaining the importance of Vladimir Lenin and the Soviet Union. Still, a festive air permeated everything. Che’s office was besieged by female admirers who lined up for hours hoping to see him; when he barred the door, they climbed through the windows. The fortress’s former officers club was thrown open to the barbudos—“bearded ones,” as the shaggy young guerrillas were nicknamed. The English writer Norman Lewis visited La Cabaña and found rebels in freshly pressed uniforms, “sipping delicately from small coffee cups, and smilingly discussing the past achievements and future promise of the new order.”

Lewis was among the small army of foreign artists, writers, and celebrities who descended on Havana to enjoy the intoxicating “honeymoon of the revolution,” as the French intellectual Jean-Paul Sartre called it. Another was veteran Milwaukee Journal reporter William J. Normyle. He visited Havana in mid-February, and was surprised to learn that Castro’s guerrillas included one of Wisconsin’s native sons. He wrote a glowing profile of Marks, dwelling on his idealism and derring-do as a freedom fighter. Marks revealed that he had no plans to leave Cuba anytime soon. “I’m staying here,” he told Normyle. “There’s a lot of work to be done.”

Marks, it seems, conveniently left his criminal history out of his interviews, telling Normyle that he had attended vocational school in Milwaukee before joining the merchant marine. What’s more, Normyle’s article didn’t mention that at least part of Marks’s work in Cuba was shooting prisoners to death.

For many foreigners, the first dark chord in Havana’s celebratory mood was struck by the start of trials for “war criminals” from the Batista regime. Nobody knows the exact death toll of the seven years of Batista’s military rule. The figure 20,000 was offered by the director of Havana’s morgue in 1959, and accepted by the revolutionary government. Although the true number may be less, nobody disputes that the carnage was horrific. Nearly every Cuban had a family member who was illegally detained, tortured, murdered, or disappeared by the regime. Castro urged Cubans not to take revenge against Batista’s henchmen who remained on the island after the dictator’s escape. He promised proper trials based on laws he had signed in the Sierra Maestra in February 1958. Yes, his brother Raúl had ordered that more than 70 Batista loyalists be machine-gunned before open graves in the city of Santiago, but henceforth, Castro insisted, the proceedings would be civilized—there would be none of the bloody mob violence associated around the world with uprisings and revolutions past.

The first trials, the so-called Cleansing Commission, were set up in Havana in January 1959 under the supervision of a young lawyer named Miguel Ángel Duque de Estrada. Che presided as the “supreme prosecutor.” Targeting the most detested members of the Batista regime, the trials were held at La Cabaña, where 800 prisoners were squeezed into stone cells made to hold only 300. Three judges heard attorneys and witnesses, then parsed the evidence to decide who was mistakenly charged, who deserved a long prison sentence, and who should be sent al paredón—“to the wall.” By the end of January, some 100 Batista loyalists had been executed.

Marks was in many ways the perfect soldier to run the firing squads. He was ambitious and had shown in the Sierra that he was not averse to undesirable and even grisly tasks. He believed that the executions of Batista’s most loathsome minions was part and parcel of the revolution, and he saw Che’s decision to put him in charge of carrying out such a difficult job on behalf of the Cuban people as an honor.

Marks achieved a burst of notoriety when the new government initiated Operation Truth. It chose three of the most brutal Batista partisans to prosecute at a public trial, and Castro invited international journalists as observers. He even offered to pay their expenses. All told, 385 journalists from U.S. and Latin American media converged on Havana. It turned out to be a PR misstep; what happened next was a show trial, held at the aptly named Coliseum, the national sports stadium. The accused men were paraded before 18,000 jeering and furious Cuban spectators. For the benefit of those who could not attend, the event was televised live.

The first accused man to take the stand was Major Jesús Sosa Blanco, a garrison officer from the provincial town of Holguín, who was charged with 108 murders, many preceded by savage torture. He was also believed to have ordered the massacre of unarmed campesinos. Over 12 hours, some 40 tearful witnesses, including widows and a 12-year-old boy, took the stage to testify about the murders of their loved ones. The audience screamed and wailed. When the handcuffed defendant morosely repeated that he had only done his duty, his words were drowned out by the crowd chanting, “Al paredón! Al paredón!”

Sosa Blanco was convicted and sentenced to death. On February 18, his appeal was adjudicated without a public audience, and his sentence was upheld. Some 200 barbudos came to watch him die. The condemned man was transported in a small bus to La Cabaña’s dry, floodlit moat, where Marks unlocked his handcuffs and led him to the spot where he would be executed. According to Marks, Sosa Blanco asked if he could address the crowd with some final words and then give the orders to the firing squad himself. Marks agreed. “Although I am marked as a criminal,” Sosa Blanco said, “I have served my government to the best of my ability as an officer.” He wished good luck to all those gathered, and then cried out: “Pelotón, atención! Prepare! Apunte! Fuego!”

All this left the international community outraged. U.S. journalists in particular denounced the executions as well as the trials at the Coliseum, some of which were televised, with language that veered into ugly bias. Time led the charge, decrying the “popcorn-munching atmosphere” and insisting that it revealed a congenital Cuban longing for “blood purges.” U.S. senators held press conferences to warn that the Cuban uprising was spinning out of control, just as the French, Russian, and Chinese revolutions had before it.

Many Cubans saw American objections to the executions as rank hypocrisy. For seven agonizing years, the U.S. government had not breathed a word of protest against Batista’s regime, which had killed so many Cuban citizens. After Batista’s flight, mass graves were opened all over the island, full of corpses with broken limbs or missing eyes; many victims had been burned, strangled, disemboweled, or buried alive. Police stations were found to contain torture implements, including handmade tools designed for pulling nails and teeth, electrical wires that could be inserted into ears, and “fire seats”—perforated metal thrones under which flames mutilated genitalia. When Castro asked Cubans for a show of support for Operation Truth, a million demonstrators gathered in Havana to demand more executions and to express outrage at the Americans’ double standards.

Soon, though, with a diplomatic tour to the United States pending, Castro bowed to international pressure and moved the trials back behind the closed doors of La Cabaña. They were now held at night within the bowels of the prison, “in a large hall that might have served as a church,” according to Norman Lewis. Benches held dozens of prisoners’ relatives, many of them women and children. “The place was surprisingly quiet,” Lewis noted, “and despite the provision of microphones I had to listen intently to follow the details of what was going on, especially when prisoners under examination replied to questions, as they usually did, in a low-voiced, hesitant fashion. Two small birds fluttered continuously under the roof.”

Although the accused men Lewis saw tried were “criminal small-fry,” he flinched at the barbarity revealed in their testimony. A boyish 18-year-old named José Cano was accused of stabbing one victim in the eyes before murdering him. Another, Gregorio Gonzalez, aged 22, said he had executed a 73-year-old grandmother with two shots to the head for harboring a pair of rebel agents in her house. A death sentence was handed down for both men. Only a woman’s gasp broke the silence in the room.

A photograph taken around the time, published in The New York Times Magazine, shows Marks in smart guerrilla khakis, standing at attention as he hears a verdict. It was his job to escort men like Cano and Gonzalez to their deaths, one after the other.

By the end of March 1959, the nightly firing squads at La Cabaña had become something of a production line. According to wire reports, Marks had already carried out 200 executions, though he claimed the figure was closer to 80; on one busy night, he told an Associated Press reporter, 11 men were put to death. To the many foreign journalists who attended, Marks insisted that he was acting as a humanitarian. It was he who had suggested that the executions take place in the moat beneath the looming white statue of Christ, because the figure would be an uplifting last sight for the condemned. He said he also wanted to ensure that the process was clean and efficient, compared with messy executions that had been conducted in the provinces.

Some observers found the proceedings a little too efficient. “It was a mechanical, cold-blooded, business-like procedure for Marks,” New York Times reporter Herbert Matthews wrote, “like a butcher killing cattle in an abattoir.” Still, glitches happened. When the floodlights failed, sentences were carried out by the headlamps of military Jeeps, as if they were gangland murders in Hollywood B movies. There were scenes of panic and despair. Some condemned men tried to buy their freedom with money or gifts. A more serious problem was that the young soldiers in the firing squads, who were generally between 16 and 20, often lost their nerve at the decisive moment. The Cubans did not follow the European tradition of giving one of the riflemen a blank round to salve the squad’s consciences, so the soldiers often aimed for a leg, a shoulder, or the wall. This left Marks to fire the fatal shot into a man now writhing in agony. On one occasion, when a man waved a Santeria hex at the riflemen and cursed them, their children, and their grandchildren, all six deliberately missed. Marks shot the man himself and had the squad court-martialed.

Marks’s local infamy rose another notch when the English-language Times of Havana, beloved by American tourists and expats, ran a profile of him on April 2. It was largely sympathetic, apart from describing him as “humorless” and noting that he “discusses his duties unsmilingly and unemotionally.” Marks hit on many of the themes he would return to in interviews over the coming months. “Running firing squads is not a pleasant job, but it’s one that must be done,” he said. “When a soldier gets his orders, he carries them out whether he likes it or not.” Marks also expressed his love for his new home. “Cuba is a beautiful country,” he said. “The people are wonderful. I like everybody here and most everybody likes me. I’ve got a good position in a happy, contented place.”

A long waiting list formed for Marks’s macabre tourist attraction. Visiting reporters, politicians, and movie stars were eager for their turn, including the Hollywood matinee idol Errol Flynn, who was so shaken by the experience that he retched on a guard’s shoes. Still, Flynn was fascinated enough to invite Marks to dine with him and his 16-year-old paramour, Beverly Aadland, in his hotel suite, where Flynn argued that condemned men should have a say in the method of their own executions. Marks disagreed, pointing out that they had never given their victims a choice. “Somebody was pretty smart in the government by putting an American in charge of blowing out Cuban brains,” Flynn wrote in a letter at the time. (Flynn also reported the rumor of Marks’s sadist coup de grâce—that he deliberately disfigured some condemned prisoners by emptying his pistol into their heads—but admitted that he had not seen it himself, despite attending several executions. The story, Flynn wrote, was “hearsay.”)

Ernest Hemingway encouraged George Plimpton to witness an execution, because “it was important that a writer get around to see just about anything, especially the excesses of human behavior.” But Plimpton didn’t attend on the night he first met Marks at El Floridita. When he, Tennessee Williams, and the other foreigners whom Marks had invited convened at the appointed time in the hotel lobby, Marks turned up only to inform them that the evening’s executions had been called off. Plimpton speculated that Marks had been set on edge by Kenneth Tynan’s rant about the proceedings at La Cabaña, and that he sensed others in the group might have concerns. “He had doubtless concluded that we were an odd lot: our own doubts so obviously seethed; we didn’t seem grateful; we kept staring at him with our mouths ajar,” Plimpton wrote.

It is also possible that Marks had no idea how famous Williams was when he extended the invitation, and had been subsequently warned off by a superior. Only the afternoon before, Tynan and Williams had visited the presidential palace to meet Castro. They waited for two and a half hours until, Tynan later wrote, “with a shrug and a cry, someone identified Mr. Williams as the famous Yankee playwright, and we were promptly whisked into Castro’s sanctum, where, unknown to us, a crucial cabinet meeting had been in session.” Castro halted the proceedings to pay tribute to Williams, explaining in faltering English “how much he admired his plays, especially the one about the cat that was upon the burning roof.”

But things didn’t end in the hotel lobby. In a final twist, as Plimpton revealed many years later to James Scott Linville and another colleague at The Paris Review, Hemingway himself decided to take his friend on an evening jaunt to see Marks at work. He prepared shakers of cocktails for himself and Plimpton to take with them. According to Linville, “Arriving at their destination, they got out, set up chairs, brought out the drinks, and arranged themselves as if they were going to watch the sunset. Soon enough, a truck came. … The truck stopped and some men with guns got out of it. In back were a couple of dozen others who were tied up. Prisoners. The men with guns hustled the others out of the back of the truck and lined them up. And then they shot them. They put the bodies back in the truck and drove off.”

By then, Marks’s reputation as a killer was international news. An AP reporter named Theodore A. Ediger broke the story in late March, and his work was syndicated, appearing in newspapers across America, including the Milwaukee Journal. Ediger’s profile detailed Marks’s work as an executioner, but the author was nonetheless a little starstruck. He described Marks as a “slender, sun-bronzed officer” who was fondly referred to as “El Capitán Herman” by his Cuban comrades. When asked about his youth in America, Marks claimed to have worked as a coal miner in Butte, Montana, and as a “hospital surgeon attendant.” Ediger concluded the piece, “He says he likes Cuba so much that he is not homesick.”

This time the publicity in Milwaukee, where Marks’s photo ran on the front page, drew the attention of John C. Burke, the warden at Waupun penitentiary, where Marks had done time. Burke contacted the Journal, and Normyle, the reporter who had met Marks in Havana back in February, did some digging and discovered Marks’s 32 criminal convictions. “Marks Left Crime Trail,” another front-page headline soon read. In the accompanying article, Burke described Marks as “a real stinker” and a “rascal” who caused constant trouble in the prison by refusing to work. The exposé was picked up by other papers and various magazines, including Time and Newsweek. It also heralded Marks’s debut in The New York Times, under the headline “Executioner Is Ex-Convict.” Marks’s criminal past was linked to rumors of his cruelty in Cuba, and to his nickname, El Carnicero.

If anything, the coverage enhanced Marks’s mystique in Havana’s expat circles, where oddballs and outsiders abounded. Marks was given the best tables in the swank restaurants that were still operating in the city’s Art Deco hotels. He became a familiar figure at El Floridita and Sloppy Joe’s, another popular drinking establishment. He made regular cameos at an office in downtown Havana, which was shared by New York Times correspondent Ruby Hart Phillips—a prim, matronly figure whose uniform was “grey sweater, carmine blouse and blue slacks,” according to Time—and Ted Scott, the brothel-hopping Times of Havana editor. In his office, Scott had set up a makeshift shooting gallery, with cards that moved on a wire; in his downtime he used an air pistol for target practice. One day, Phillips had to restrain Marks from trying to hit the cards with his .45 revolver.

Jean Secon, a striking American photojournalist in her twenties, had moved to Havana in 1958 and established herself as a stringer. She was arrested by Batista’s regime for attempting to meet Castro in the Sierra and flown back to Havana. After the revolution succeeded, she became a fixture in the city, hobnobbing with barbudos in restaurants and bars. In early 1959, she met Marks while attending an execution. The two hit it off and became romantically involved.

The couple shared a talent for Gatsby-like reinvention. Like Marks, Secon had buried her past in America. She’d fled her life in upstate New York, divorced her husband, and worked as a model in Manhattan before lighting out for Cuba. Now her life was full of adventure. Her future in the tropics, and with Marks, looked bright.

Part Three

In May 1959, following a successful diplomatic tour of the United States—where he was feted by crowds in Washington, D.C., and New York City, and on the campuses of Harvard and Princeton—Castro put an end to the execution of “war criminals.” According to the most reliable figures, some 500 of Batista’s cronies had been sent to the wall, most of them on Marks’s watch. On June 2, Che was married at La Cabaña to his sweetheart Aleida March, a guerrillera who had been his personal assistant during the war. After a rum-fueled reception in his bodyguard’s quarters, Che was sent by Castro on an international tour, which took him to India, China, and Africa.

Marks and the other men under Che’s command regarded his new diplomatic role as a demotion from his work at La Cabaña. They were also upset to learn that they would all be transferred to the sleepy province of Las Villas to do odd jobs, such as enforce the desegregation of beaches. “It was like the house falling down,” one of Che’s young officers recalled.

Over the summer of 1959, the happy atmosphere for American expats in Cuba eroded. Castro’s government followed through on its promise to break up sugar estates larger than 3,300 acres, including Castro’s own family farm near Birán and vast tracts owned by American companies. Instead of providing compensation in cash, the government offered dubious bonds. Tit-for-tat retaliation between Washington and Havana ensued. Moscow, sensing an opportunity, stepped up its support for Castro’s government. Historians continue to debate whether Castro jumped or was pushed into the arms of the Soviet Union. What’s certain is that his government gradually filled with Communist activists.

Marks would later tell U.S. authorities—perhaps playing to their sentiments—that he opposed the creep of Communism into the ranks of Cuba’s freedom fighters. He claimed that when he discovered that the literacy teachers at La Cabaña were using Communist pamphlets for their classes, he made a bonfire out of the reading material—a move that surely would have annoyed the pro-Soviet Che, had he heard about it, but which was not yet a punishable offense. After the move to Las Villas, Marks blamed his political outspokenness for a series of further transfers deeper into the countryside, a sort of Cuban Siberia. For a while he was in a “no-man’s-land,” as he put it, training “misfits” from the rebel army who had gone AWOL or fallen asleep on duty. Eventually, he ended up in the city of Santa Clara, with his captain’s rank intact but no duties to perform.

While he was posted in the provinces, Marks observed from a distance a bizarre episode of Cold War espionage in which a fellow American guerrilla fighter—William Morgan, known as the Yankee Comandante—helped foil a military coup against Castro backed by the right-wing dictator of the Dominican Republic. In the crackdown on critics of the revolution that followed, Secon made her first appearance in The New York Times, not as a reporter but as a news item. When she and another journalist tried to interview Morgan in his Havana home, the pair had the honor of being the first U.S. correspondents arrested by the Castro regime. The nature of the charges was never clear, a sign of the government’s increasingly authoritarian bent and Castro’s suspicion of a free press. Secon and the other journalist were detained for a week, then released.

In September, Che returned from his triumphant world tour—he was the toast of the international left—and revisited his old regiment in the provinces, informing them that he was moving into Cuba’s civil sector. He would run the Industrialization Department, to develop the national economy, and take over as head of the National Bank. Marks, though, remained in his rural limbo; Che, always a calculating figure, had evidently decided that the American was no longer of any special use. Then, in a lucky break, Marks ran into another of his former guerrilla commanders, the prodigiously bearded Camilo Cienfuegos, who pulled a few strings and got him transferred back to Havana to command an infantry battalion at Campo Libertad (Fort Freedom). Marks was put in charge of the various security details assigned to officials’ homes and to Havana’s railways and bridges. He was given a large house with a swimming pool, along with a Packard sedan.

That October, one of Castro’s most beloved Sierra compañeros, Huber Matos, resigned from the rebel army to protest the growing influence of Communists in the government. He was immediately arrested as a counter-revolutionary and sentenced to 30 years in prison. Matos’s imprisonment was a turning point in U.S.-Cuban relations: The Eisenhower administration issued increasingly bellicose statements, and Cubans began to feel a sense of siege. Bombs planted by anti-Castro agents exploded in Havana stores, and light planes from Florida dropped incendiary devices to set fire to sugarcane fields. Anti-Castro guerrillas began operating in the countryside, funded by right-wing exile communities in Miami. By the end of 1959, the CIA was thinking about assassinating Castro, a consideration supposedly justified by the increasing presence of Soviet officials in Cuba. The American public was also souring on the revolution. It wasn’t long before the New York press, which previously had compared Castro to George Washington, began referring to the Cuban leader contemptuously as El Beardo.

As rumors of an impending U.S. invasion grew, Castro began arming Cuban citizens with vintage Soviet weapons, and he revived the tribunals—this time with the power to impose a death sentence for offenses against the revolution. In January 1960, Marks was made chief security officer at El Princípe prison, another colonial relic in Havana. Its cells were crammed with 3,000 inmates, mostly opponents of Castro from militant dissident groups. The Butcher was told to get back to business.

In February 1960, a U.S. embassy staff officer named Wayne Gilchrist steered his lumbering Chevrolet into the cobbled courtyard of El Princípe and handed Marks an envelope. Inside was a Certificate of Loss of Nationality. The United States had stripped Marks of his citizenship.

It was another indicator, if any more were needed, that the romance between the United States and revolutionary Cuba was well and truly over. One by one, Marks and other yanqui expats who had remained in Castro’s forces after Batista’s exit were stripped of citizenship. Their crime? Serving in a foreign military.

Marks did not take the news lying down. A few days after Gilchrist’s visit, he held a press conference. Secon covered the thinly attended event—Marks later conceded that it had lured only “three or four” journalists—for the Times of Havana and the wire service United Press International. The Times ran her story on the front page, with a photo of Marks wearing a beret and a “well-trimmed beard,” as she described it, which he “thoughtfully fingered” as he pondered his legal situation. Marks claimed that Americans in Cuba were being targeted for political reasons. “A person’s citizenship is his right of birth,” he declared, noting that Americans had fought in the Spanish Civil War and as part of the British and French armies in the two World Wars without losing their nationality. “I am proud to have fought with such men as Che Guevara and Fidel Castro, proud to be part of the revolution,” he concluded, “but I am also proud of being an American citizen, and I do not intend to stop being one.”

Secon editorialized her own outrage. “If the reputation Herman Marks won in the Sierra Maestra still holds,” she wrote, “the U.S. State Department will have one hell of a battle denying what the man calls his birthright.”

By the time of the press conference, Marks was well into his stint at El Princípe. His time there produced a string of lurid stories, although their veracity is difficult to establish; most were retroactively spread by Miami Cubans when anti-Castro propaganda became virulent in their city. In the Cuban poet Armando Valladares’s error-filled 1986 memoir, Against All Hope, Marks is depicted as a savage drunkard who referred to the prison as his “private hunting preserve” and would order the guards to attack inmates with chains and truncheons before stealing their possessions. Valladares describes Marks’s executions as gory ordeals, with the American often bringing his pet dog with him to lap up the blood of the condemned. John Martino—an American casino worker with mob connections who was arrested for smuggling Batista henchmen out of the country—wrote a tome in 1963 called I Was Castro’s Prisoner, which includes a chapter entitled “Sadists and Perverts of El Princípe.” After one inmate begged to be spared, Martino claimed, Marks fired all the rounds in his pistol into the man’s face, turning it into “a shapeless piece of meat,” and supposedly giving his mother a fatal heart attack when she opened his coffin at the funeral.

The story later circulated that Marks was stripped of his position at El Princípe due to his brutality and alleged theft of prison funds; Marks denied the charges when they surfaced. Whatever the truth, he was transferred from the prison in March 1960 to downtown Havana, where he trained police officers in firearm safety after a series of clumsy shooting accidents injured bystanders. It was a demotion, perhaps, but hardly a disgrace.

Despite months of relative luxury thanks to his job perks, Marks was painfully aware that life for Americans in Cuba was becoming more dangerous by the day. The escalating drama was excellent copy for Secon, but it risked spinning out of control and trapping the couple, or worse. The most alarming sign was an enormous May Day rally in the Plaza de la Revolución, where cadres of Cubans armed with their Soviet weapons marched past Castro’s podium in a tropical echo of Moscow’s military parades. Castro orated about the threat of a U.S. invasion, which Cubans, he said, would face like the Spartans at Thermopylae. A chant began: “Cuba sí, yanqui no!”

Marks became convinced that he was being followed by Cuban intelligence agents. His paranoia increased when, in early May, several officers close to him were arrested. Secon was just as jittery. As Marks later recounted, “A lot of people were coming to the same conclusion: Get out while there was still a chance.”


Pólvora, perfumes y cherokees: un paracaidista cubano en Normandía

Por Maikel Mederos Fiallo

Servando Montó y González, hijo de un mambí español, se fue a Estados Unidos y se enroló como infante en el ejército. Por sus condiciones físicas fue seleccionado para formar parte de la 82 División Aero Transportada. Con ella desembarcó en 1944 en Normandía, Francia, resultando herido en combate.
Con mente lúcida, a sus 91 años, en el 2015, Servando brindó una entrevista (de la que brindamos un extenso fragmento) a Adalberto Hernández Santos y Harold Bertot Triana en su casa en el municipio de Boyeros, La Habana. Repasó con naturalidad cada momento de su vida. Su carácter, que parecía estar forjado por las vicisitudes de la guerra, permitió que solo sonriera en momentos precisos y no diera rodeos para decir hasta las cosas más crudas de la guerra.

– Servando, ¿dónde naciste y cómo te enrolas en el Ejército norteamericano para pelear contra el nazismo?
– Nací en Los Pinos, La Habana, el 21 de diciembre de 1926. Mi padre había venido con el ejército español en la guerra hispano-cubana de 1895, como sanitario, y se pasó al bando de los cubanos. Nunca quiso coger la pensión de veteranos. Se llamaba Arturo Montó. Cuando yo tenía seis meses mi familia se muda para una casa en la calle Amargura, entre Villega y Aguacate, en La Habana Vieja. Con siete u ocho años nos fuimos a vivir para el barrio de Luyanó. De ahí fui para los Estados Unidos, porque había una artista que hacía películas del Oeste, que formaba un matrimonio con un amigo de mi familia, que quiso llevarme con ella y se lo permitieron. Esta norteamericana me llevó para California, para una enorme mansión, con unas caballerizas enormes. Estando allá me enseñó a montar caballos, a brincar cercas, a disparar con revólver de las películas del Oeste, aquellos calibres 44 que pesaban cantidad. Estuve unos años con ella viviendo en Oakland y me matricularon en una escuela como tres o cuatro años. Pero cuando ella tuvo un accidente automovilístico, que le costó la vida, y su esposo muere después, me fui para Cayo Hueso, para la casa de un notario pariente de mi familia. Ya tenía entonces unos 15 años. Desde entonces traté de entrar en el Ejército norteamericano, pero era muy joven. Pero cuando cumplo 17 años en Cayo Hueso, el notario, que conocía a todo el mundo en este lugar, fue a ver al oficial que reclutaba jóvenes. Cuando le preguntaron mi edad él mintió y dijo que yo tenía 18 años, y además, como vieron que yo hablaba bien el inglés, en la parte de la planilla que había que poner la ciudadanía, pusieron que yo tenía ciudadanía norteamericana.
– ¿Qué le motivó alistarse en el Ejército y cómo llega a la 82 División aerotransportada?
– Cuando en Cayo Hueso me alistan yo no sabía bien qué era el fascismo. Lo mío en esos entonces fue un deseo de hacer aventuras, motivado por las películas del Oeste, y por aquellas películas de la propia guerra. Y como me gustaba la aviación, quería tirarme en paracaídas. Pero en aquellos momentos no se podía entrar a la 82 División Aerotransportada desde la calle, tenía que pasar primero por la infantería y tener los lineamientos básicos del ejército. Entonces me mandaron para Camp Lee, en Virginia. Después de haber visto algunas propagandas para alistar hombres, y de conocer que en la 82 pagaban el doble -el salario era de 150 dólares y el soldado 75-, solicité entrar en la 82. Una vez que lo hice me enviaron para Fort Benning, Georgia. Allí entraban capitanes, coroneles, etc., pero todos entraban como soldados. En cuanto nos presentamos todos los aspirantes, nos dijeron: “Bueno, ustedes quieren entrar a la 82 división, tenemos 8 semanas, y en estas 8 semanas vamos a separar a los niños de los hombres. Los niños vuelven a la infantería, los hombres se quedan en la 82.”
El entrenamiento les digo que no era fácil. No todo el mundo estaba preparado para soportarlo. Un sargento era el jefe del entrenamiento. Yo formaba parte de la Compañía 407, batallón 505, número 44115608. Teníamos que levantarnos a las 6 de la mañana, y aunque estuviera nevando, teníamos que correr en short y pulóver. Las marchas aquellas eran muy difíciles. Eran como 32 millas caminando y cuando terminabas te pedían abrir la cantimplora y virarla: tenía que estar llena de agua. Ellos siempre nos decían que lleváramos y comiéramos papas crudas que daban energías. Les digo que en aquellos momentos parecía verdad. Pero no podías tomar agua. El jiujitsu y la defensa personal eran entrenados para matar. Lo impartían instructores japoneses nacidos en Estados Unidos. También tenías que tirar hasta que fueras francotirador.
Había que correr mucho para fortalecer las piernas. Imagínense que cuando te lanzabas en paracaídas las piernas tenían que soportar el peso tuyo más 200 libras que llevabas arriba. Es como si te tiraran desde un tercer piso. Debes caer con la punta de los pies, ellos te enseñan los puntos de contactos y otras cosas. Entonces te graduabas con 5 saltos de día y uno de noche. En los entrenamientos para tirarte en paracaídas te llevan para una torre de 250 pies de altura con el paracaídas abierto, y te sueltan desde allá arriba. Después tenía que hacer pruebas desde un avión y desde un planeador. Los que pasaban iban para Fort Bragg, Carolina del Norte. Yo me gradué el 29 de abril de 1944.
– Son famosas las historias de los indios cherokee que formaron parte de esta División.
– Habían varios cherokee en el batallón, en la escuadra mía tenía a dos. Recuerdo que los fastidiaba y les decía: “Dicen que ustedes no pueden morir de noche porque los espíritus no los encuentran, no se preocupen cuando a ustedes los maten yo les pongo la linterna al lado”. Ellos se reían conmigo. Según me explicaban ellos, desde chiquitos, cuando iban a llorar, la madre les tapaba la nariz y la boca, y cuando ya estaban para ahogarse, se las quitaban. Entonces cuando iban a volver a llorar, le hacían lo mismo. Eran bravos. Les gustaba más el cuchillo que las ametralladoras. La mujer del presidente Rooselvelt, Eleonor, en una ocasión les dijo a nuestros Jefes que por qué cobraban casi el doble si hacían lo mismo que otros soldados. Esto salió en el periódico. Y el Jefe le respondió, “no señora, ellos no hacen lo mismo”, y la invitó a una maniobra donde saltaron los indios cherokee. Y cuando salió, Eleonor le dijo al General Miller, que ella creía que el doble del salario era muy poco. “Pero le voy a dar un consejo –le dijo al general-, antes de soltarlo para la vida civil, páselos por campamentos de rehabilitación.”
– Volviendo al curso de los acontecimientos, ¿Cuándo salen para Europa?
– Para mediados de mayo salimos para Inglaterra. Nos llevaron para Liverpool y después para Somerset. Fuimos en el Queen Mary que salió del puerto de New York. Estuvimos como 15 días en Liverpool donde llovía constantemente. Decididos a saltar en Normandía, Orly estaba a 32 kilómetros y Somerset a 152. Según se dice el jefe de la Inteligencia alemana le dijo a Hitler que el desembarco principal era por Normandía. Al parecer Hitler objetó que el Jefe de la Inteligencia no tenía elementos para decir que era por Normandía. Y todavía cuando se peleaba en las playas de Caen, Hitler creía que eso era un simulacro.
En la comida del día 5 ya sabíamos que íbamos a saltar. Nos explicaron a la perfección todo lo que teníamos que hacer en tierra. Antes de saltar nos despide en una formación general, el Jefe Supremo Einsenhower y el general James Gavin, el general Jefe de la División 82. Hay quien dice que a Einsenhower se le aguaron los ojos cuando salimos. Eran 226 aviones, sin contar los planeadores.
La 82 se tiró por Utah, para darle protección a la 29 división y a la 4ta división de infantería americana. La idea del grupo nuestro era que, como la resistencia francesa no pudo volar los puentes –los cuales no recuerdo donde estaban específicamente-, los teníamos que volar nosotros. Teníamos que volar los tres, porque no hacías nada con que dejaras uno en pie. Cuando sucede la invasión, el general alemán Edwin Rommel estaba en Berlín, porque ese mismo día, 6 de junio, era el cumpleaños de la mujer. Él tenía a su cargo la 5ta división de tanques blindados. Si metían esa división por ahí, se perdía Normandía. Una parte tenía que dar protección en Utah y otra volar los puentes.
La 82 también se tiró en Le Mans. Pero allí pasó una tragedia. En esta zona estaba un pantano, lleno de alemanes, y después del pantano habían una zona que no había ningún alemán. Como era lógico, debían tirarse fuera del pantano, pero se equivocaron y los tiraron arriba del pantano: ninguno llegó vivo a tierra.
– ¿Te generó temor saltar en esos momentos?
– Nosotros no tuvimos tiempo de sentir miedo cuando nos tiramos. Lo que sí había era preocupación por la localización de los nidos de ametralladoras. Camino a los puentes no hubo ninguna resistencia, porque esa zona la tenía controlada la resistencia francesa. Ahí es cuando conozco a Marcel, que era el responsable de la resistencia en toda esa área. En la destrucción de los puentes hubo una gran oposición de los alemanes. La lucha llegó hasta el cuerpo a cuerpo, con bayoneta, granada de manos, aquellos fue horrible. De la escuadra de nosotros quedamos los 8.
Volar los puentes era más importante que mantener Normandía y lo logramos. Éramos del grupo que pertenecíamos a demolición. De ahí seguimos para tomar Nantes. Los combates en este lugar duraron dos días. Cuando llegamos a las puertas de esta ciudad, había dos entradas. Uno de la escuadra me dice: “Oye, la entrada de la derecha está llena de alemanes, para la izquierda no hay nadie.” Y le dije: “Vámonos para la derecha. Los alemanes no son bobos, si dejan abierta una entrada es por algo.” Y en efecto, habían puesto minas de madera, que volaron un camión y lo hicieron mil pedazos. Ya Marcel estaba con nosotros.
Aquí tengo un episodio terrible. Terminando la toma de Nantes, teníamos rodeados a un grupo de alemanes en una casa, y sale un alemán con un niño de meses en los brazos. Tenía un cuchillo puesto en su cuello. Nosotros no hablábamos alemán y aquel hombre estaba diciendo cosas. El que estaba al lado mío me dice que lo tenía entre ceja y ceja para dispararle. Aquel alemán no tenía ni el casco puesto. Y le dije: “Oye, mira a ver que tiene un niño…” y me respondió: “No te preocupes, que lo tengo para darle un tiro en el medio de la frente.” En efecto, el nuestro cuando creía que lo tenía en la mira, dispara. Pero, en una milésima de segundo, alguien llama al alemán, y este volteó la cabeza. El disparo sólo consiguió rasparle la oreja. Al momento, el alemán con el cuchillo degolló al chiquito. ¡Se pueden imaginar! Yo le dije a mi gente que mataran a todos los alemanes, pero que dejaran al alemán que mató el chiquito -al tuvimos que enterrar nosotros-, pues ese era de los cherokee. Estos lo pelaron vivo. Aquello fue lo más doloroso que viví en la guerra.
– ¿Es en Nantes donde lo hieren?
– En Nantes me hieren. Lo más peligroso en una guerra no es la bala, es la metralla. En una ocasión yo vi la metralla coger a una persona y separarle la boca y la mejilla y pegársela a la oreja. A mí me cogió un pedazo de metralla. Lo que sucedió es que yo tengo una obsesión con los perfumes desde chiquito. Entonces yo veo en una tienda dos pomos Garlain, el mejor perfume francés. Y en una gran balacera, rompo la vidriera y cojo el primer perfume. Y entonces un teniente, que estaba detrás de mí, me grita que cómo me iba a parar a coger perfumes con la balacera que había. Bueno, lo que me salva la vida es el intento de coger el segundo pomo: me coge la metralla y me impacta en el brazo, porque de lo contrario me hubiera dado en el cerebro o en los ojos. Cuando se me mete en el brazo, yo arranco la tela. Estaban los pedacitos en la carne. Me molestaba cantidad, pero me piqué la manga y me eché perfume en la herida después de echarme azufre. Me molestaba cantidad, cualquier movimiento que hacía me provocaba mucha molestia.
Después de Nantes llegué a St. Nazarie, a un hospital de guerra. Había un médico francés, que en cuanto me vio el brazo negro dijo que yo tenía gangrena, y que había que amputar casi todo el brazo. Pero había un médico norteamericano, que vio la insignia de la 82 división, y habló con el médico francés. Entonces aquel hombre cogió un algodón, lo mojó en no sé qué cosa y me lo pasó por el brazo: toda la negrura aquella se cayó. “Es pólvora. Este muchacho siguió peleando herido, ahí no hay gangrena ninguna.” Y sin anestesia me sacó el pedacito de metralla que quedaba. Imagínate que cuando llegué al hospital le estaban amputando a uno la pierna sin anestesia. El tema de la anestesia era crítico. Al otro día me fui del hospital y seguí peleando por todo el sur de Francia hasta llegar al principado de Mónaco, después de recoger gente en Marsella. Entonces nos dejaron de tapón en Niza, que está pegada a la frontera italiana.
– ¿Cómo los recibía la población de las zonas liberadas?
– La recepción que nos daba el pueblo francés era tremenda. Se volvían locos con nosotros. La resistencia era la encargada de poner el gobierno. En cada uno de esos pueblos la resistencia tuvo que fusilar a los tipos de la Gestapo que pertenecían a la Policía francesa. Marcel se quedó en St. Nazarie. Él quería que yo me quedara con la resistencia francesa, y le dije: “Tú estás loco, me fusilan por desertor. Tú sí puedes venir con nosotros, que hablas francés y hablas inglés.” Imagínate que la Gestapo le mató a sus hijas pequeñas después de torturárselas. Le fueron rompiendo los huesos delante de la madre, para que le dijera dónde estaba él, pero ella no lo sabía. Mataron a la mujer y a las dos hijitas. Se quedó solo.
– ¿Nunca más supo de su vida?
– De Marcel supe después de la guerra. En un vuelo que hice en el año 1954 por España, cuando estaba de piloto en la Compañía Cubana de Aviación. Estuve una semana en Madrid, y con el carnet de piloto pude ir a París gratis, para buscarlo en St. Nazarie. Cuando llego, un viejito que estaba por allí, mientras yo preguntaba, me dijo que lo había fusilado la Policía francesa. Y un día, hace algunos años, para que ustedes vean cómo son las cosas, un amigo mío de cuando yo trabajaba en la referida compañía, compra un casete con un documental que daba los nombres de todos los que murieron en la Resistencia francesa. Confirmé entonces que había sido fusilado por la Policía Francesa.
Marcel era un cerebro, pero un hombre muy sufrido. En una ocasión nosotros tomamos una casa donde no hubo resistencia. Era una tremenda mansión y adentro había un capitán del ejército francés con 5 soldados. Habían cogido la casa para dársela a algún general alemán o algo de eso. Pero ninguno de nosotros hablaba francés. Y decíamos para nosotros: “Coño, un capitán del ejército francés con cinco soldados aquí.” Esperamos entonces a que llegara Marcel. ¡Ave María!, cuando llegó Marcel y vio al capitán aquel, lo agarró por el cuello, le dijo cuarenta cosas, sacó la pistola y le dio un tiro en el medio de la frente. Entonces dije que a los cinco soldados alemanes los soltaran para la calle.
– De lo que usted vivió ¿qué diferenció a los alemanes del resto de los soldados en la lucha, y qué hacían con ellos cuando los tomaban prisioneros?
– El fracaso de los alemanes estaba en que las operaciones nada más lo sabían los oficiales. Mataban a los oficiales y los soldados se perdían. En el Ejército norteamericano mataban a un oficial y el soldado sabía lo que tenía que hacer. Ese fue un error de los alemanes. Cuando tú ponías lo pies en tierra, lo primero que tenías que hacer era buscar “nidos”, una instalación de ametralladoras 30 y 50. Ese es el primer objetivo que tú tenías que buscar.
Respecto a la segunda parte, les digo que nosotros no hacíamos prisioneros alemanes. No podíamos hacer prisioneros. Los alemanes eran valientes. Tú los formabas para fusilarlos y ni pestañaban cuando le tirabas. En honor a la verdad el soldado alemán era muy bueno en la guerra, muy disciplinado. Una cosa que me llamaba la atención era que, con todo el fango que había, tú los veías con las botas limpias, afeitados. Peleaban duro. Para mí el mejor soldado de la Segunda Guerra Mundial fue el alemán, después el ruso, seguido del inglés, y último el norteamericano. Y no era que el norteamericano no fuera bueno, porque pelearon durísimo, pero tenían que estar levantándole la moral con Glenn Miller, y un grupo de artistas norteamericanas. Los alemanes eran fanáticos. Dicen que el Africa Korps de Rommel tenía muchachos castrados desde niños. Nada más que dedicados a ello. Sin embargo, Rommel era un caballero. Lo dice el que lo derrotó, el general inglés Montgomery. A los oficiales que cogía preso no los desarmaba y almorzaban y comían con ellos. Él decía que un oficial se tenía que ver oficial aunque estuviera encuero.
– ¿En algún momento algún alemán que capturaron les comentó algo sobre la guerra?
– Me parece que fue un coronel que detuvimos, que hablaba un poquito de inglés. Nos dijo que ellos sabían que Hitler estaba loco, pero Alemania estaba en guerra y ellos eran alemanes.
– ¿Qué hicieron después que llegaron a Niza?
– Estuvimos en Niza hasta el final de la guerra. Luego llegó una orden de que los que habían estado en hospitales militares tenían que salir para Estados Unidos. Nos sacaron por Marsella para New York. Me dieron la cinta, que todavía poseo, que es la del Teatro de Operaciones Europeo. Sobre esa cinta están las dos estrellas de bronce. Me dieron también la Estrella de Plata. Recuerdo cuando el capitán me dijo: “Usted está propuesto para la Estrella de plata.” Y yo le pregunté: “¿Y por qué yo estoy propuesto para estrella de plata?” Y me contesta: “Porque usted estuvo peleando herido”. “¿Y dónde me iba a meter, si estábamos tomando Nantes?” – le respondí. Me dijo: “Sí, pero usted podía haberse metido en una de las casas tomadas.” “Bueno – le contesté–, en verdad no se me hubiera ocurrido.” “Bueno – me dijo aquel hombre – por no ocurrírsele también se la dieron a McArthur y se la dieron al coronel que se tiró en planeador y se partió las piernas en tres partes, y siguió dirigiendo el combate en una carretilla”. Sobre este último creo que John Wayne hizo una película.
– Hay una película muy famosa, protagonizada por el actor estadounidense Tom Hanks, Saving private Ryan y una serie que fue muy popular en los Estados Unidos, Band of Brothers, esta última sobre la actuación de una compañía de la 101 división aerotransportada durante el desembarco y el resto de la guerra. ¿Lograron mostrar la verdadera realidad que se vive en una guerra y lo que realmente sucedió?
– La serie que me dicen no la he visto. Pero sí puede ver la película Saving private Ryan. Una película muy buena, pero hay detalles históricos que pasaron por alto. Por ejemplo, lo que tuvo que hacer parte de la 82 división aerotransportada y la 6ta división aerotransportada inglesa –que por cierto usaban ballestas –, para permitir que los norteamericanos avanzaran por Caen. Eso no lo tuvieron en cuenta y creo que eso le trajo algunas críticas.
Por cierto, tengo una anécdota simpática con esta película. La primera vez que escucho que iban a ponerla en la televisión cubana, espero sentado en mi casa, y por alguna razón no la pusieron. Esto pasó también una segunda vez. Entonces se me ocurre llamar a la televisión y preguntar por el día en que finalmente la iban a poner. Y la muchacha que me sale al teléfono, después de indicarme el día, me recomienda que no me la pierda. “Bueno, pero usted sabe algo de eso, es mejor si tiene conocimientos históricos sobre lo que pasó allí”. “Bueno, algo conozco, algo sé de lo que pasó allí” le respondo (se sonríe). Por supuesto que si le digo la verdad lo más probable era que dijera: “Y quién es el loco este que dice que estuvo en Normandía”.